Hagen revised the entire work a final time during the summer of 1990. Satisfied that the symphony was at last finished, he offered the world premiere of the completed work to Michael Morgan, who subsequently introduced Symphony No. 2 with the Oakland East Bay Symphony Orchestra on 3 April 1993 at the Calvin Simmons Theatre in Oakland, California.
...Big, exuberant, brashly scored and infectiously enjoyable.
— John von Rhein, The Chicago Tribune, 11/22/88
....bright, lively, accessible, amusing and contemporary without being in any way difficult for the
sophisticated listener. The Chicago Symphony might find it an ideal encore for their next tour.
— Robert C. Marsh, The Chicago Sun-Times, 11/21/88
The music beguiles by its instrumentation. It is chunky in its chordal tendencies, pixieish in intent.
— Barbara Zuck, The Columbus Dispatch, 10/6/90
....showed a firm compositional hand in its structural logic and conviction of utterance, a sensitive ear in the
delicately transparent textures, and a sure heart in the soaring melodies it ultimately yielded.
— Nancy Miller, The Milwaukee Sentinal,8/6/88
[The last movement] begins with a meandering harp solo with just
enough pointed dissonance to place it on the cusp between arpeggio and melody. In a string of
solos for cello, oboe, and trumpet, material first heard in the harp mutates into a lush adagio
melody that peaks in a statement by the violins. A lively, carnival-like theme enters, distantly at first,
like an approaching parade. As this theme
'nears,' it becomes clear that it is in a competing key, and there is a long bi-tonal episode as it
'passes.' When the carnival tune fades away, gentle music based on the harp material brings the
piece to a quiet, satisfying conclusion.
— Tom Strini, The Milwaukee Journal,4/20/90
[The final movement] is a 15-minute orchestral adagio reminiscent in modest terms of
those of late Mahler and Prokofiev.... Melodies were elegantly spun, episodes flowed coherently into
one another, and textures remained clear even during employment of the entire orchestra.
— Nancy Raabe, The Milwaukee Sentinel, 4/20/90
[The finale], in its local premiere [by the New York Philharmonic], combined
different thematic material to weave its multi-hued textures, which range from sparse and subtly-
drawn to opulent and boldly glittering. Some melodies are dangerously beautiful - Hagen teeters on
the edge of sugary, but never falls in.
— Susan Elliot,The New York Post,, 7/30/90
[The finale's] melodic profusion and playful ebullience were a welcome tonic
after the dourness of the [other] works. Hagen's piece opens and closes with an extended solo for
the harp. [It has an] appealing palette of orchestral colors. Toward the middle, the piece turns into
an extended Straussian circus....
— Lesley Valdes, The Philadelphia Inquirer,10/20/90
Yesterday's [concert at the Kennedy Center] unveiled the talent of a young American composer
who need stand in no one's shadow. Common Ground [the finale of his Symphony
No. 2] was the most diatonic of the four works on the program and without question the most
accessible. His superbly uncommon orchestrations served the somewhat common material
well.
— Mark Carrington, The Washington Post,10/29/80
Common Ground (the finale to Hagen's Second Symphony but standing alone on
this occasion) also came through in a favorable light. One heard the melodic influence of Dvorak
and Brahms; but the orchestration had an original stamp, stemming from a method the composer
describes as 'moving blocks of sound around the way a visual artist moves shapes around when
composing space'.
— Charles McCardell, Musical America Magazine,October, 1990